Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorİris, Nur Efe
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Aslıhan
dc.contributor.authorKoçulu, Safiye
dc.contributor.authorÇevik, Esin
dc.contributor.authorDiz-Küçükkaya, Reyhan
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-27T13:25:52Z
dc.date.available2016-07-27T13:25:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationIris NE, Demirel A, Koculu S, Cevik E, Kucukkaya RD. Quinolone resistance of gram negative bacteria from the patients with malignancies and relationship with prophylaxis. Med-Science. 2016. doi:10.5455/medscience.2016.05.8441en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-0634
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11446/1051en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=219698en_US
dc.descriptionİstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi.en_US
dc.description.abstractFluoroquinolones are the most commonly used antibiotics for the treatment and prophylaxis of patients with malignancies. But resistance development is a big problem.With the aim of identifying the epidemiological data about the local fluoroquinolone resistance of the patients with malignancies followed up in the hospital or on outpatient basis, fluoroquinolone resistance of gram negative bacteria isolated from different materials of these patients was investigated. In our hospital, from January 2013 to August 2014, gram negative isolates that were isolated from the samples of patients with malignancies followed-up by Hematology and Oncology Departments were retrospectively analyzed. Within a period of one and a half years, 227 Gram negative bacteria were isolated from the materials of the patients hospitalized in our hospital. Quinolone resistance rates were 63% for E.coli, 49% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 34% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 72% for Acinetobacter baumannii , with a mean of 52% for all Gram negatives. When patients who received and who did not receive quinolone prophylaxis were compared, resistance rate was 57% (26/61) for those receiving prophylaxis and 50 %( 83/166) for those who did not. In conclusion, fluoroquinolone resistance rates were considerably high and it was higher in the patients who received quinolone prophylaxis, but it wasn't statistically significant. In the oral treatment of febrile neutropenic patients, empirical treatment aims at Gram negative pathogens and considers quinolones as the first choice; however this data raises a suspicion about the efficacy and adequacy of quinolones.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medscience.2016.05.8441en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectquinolone resistanceen_US
dc.subjectgram negative bacteriaen_US
dc.subjectmalignancy patientsen_US
dc.subjectquinolone prophylaxisen_US
dc.titleQuinolone resistance of gram negative bacteria from the patients with malignancies and relationship with prophylaxisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalMedicine scienceen_US
dc.departmentDBÜ, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR43748en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR45031en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR222359en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR106451en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR116136en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryBelirsizen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster