dc.contributor.author | Toker, Alper | |
dc.contributor.author | Özyurtkan, Mehmet Oğuzhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Demirhan, Özkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Ayalp, Kemal | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaba, Erkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Uyumaz, Elena | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-25T08:00:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-25T08:00:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Toker A, Ozyurtkan MO, Demirhan O, Ayalp K, Kaba E, Uyumaz E. Lymph Node Dissection in Surgery for Lung Cancer: Comparison of Open vs. Video-Assisted vs. Robotic-Assisted Approaches. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00087 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1341-1098 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11446/1080 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/atcs/advpub/0/advpub_oa.16-00087/_article | en_US |
dc.description | İstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: We compared open, video-assisted and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgical techniques in the dissection of N1 and N2-level lymph nodes during surgery for lung cancer.
Methods: This retrospective analysis is based on prospectively collected data of patients (excluding those with N2 or N3 diseases, and sleeve resections) undergoing mediastinal lymph node dissection via open (n = 96), video-assisted thoracoscopy (n = 68), and robotic-assisted thoracoscopy (n = 106). The groups are compared according to the number of lymph node stations dissected, the number of lymph nodes dissected, and the number of lymph nodes dissected by stations.
Results: Three techniques had similar results based on the number of the dissected N1 and N2-level lymph node stations. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery yielded significantly more lymph nodes in total (p = 0.0007), and in the number of dissected N1-level nodes (p <0.0001). All techniques yielded similar number of mediastinal lymph nodes, whereas robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) yielded more station #11 and #12 lymph nodes compared to the other groups.
Conclusions: In this study, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has been shown to dissect more lymph nodes at N1 level. However, taking the open approach as standard, we could claim that both currently robotic and video-assisted techniques may provide similar number of dissected N1 and N2-level lymph node stations. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Axel Springer Japan Publishing | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00087 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | lymph node dissection | en_US |
dc.subject | lung cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | video-assisted thoracoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject | robotic surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | thoracotomy | en_US |
dc.title | Lymph node dissection in surgery for lung cancer: Comparison of open vs. video-assisted vs. robotic-assisted approaches | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | en_US |
dc.department | DBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | TR175564 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | TR103393 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | TR40362 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | TR40353 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Belirsiz | en_US |