Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorArikan T.
dc.contributor.authorEmek E.
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt B.
dc.contributor.authorMammadov E.
dc.contributor.authorCeyhan O.
dc.contributor.authorSahin T.
dc.contributor.authorTokat Y.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T15:52:46Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T15:52:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0041-1345
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.160
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/1715
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The variation of multiple bile ducts in a living donor graft is not infrequent; however, the literature on the impact of the number of bile ducts on postoperative biliary complications is scarce. We investigated whether the number of biliary duct anastomoses affects the rate of postoperative biliary complications in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and January 2018, all patients who underwent LDLT were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the number bile duct anastomoses (single duct [group A, n = 78] or multiple ducts [group B, n = 94]). Data collection included demographic features, Child Pugh Score (CPS), graft-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), surgical data including technique of biliary anastomosis (duct-to-duct, duct-to-sheath, double duct-to-duct, and hepaticojejunostomy), and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: The duct-to-duct anastomosis was the mostly commonly performed technique in group A, whereas double duct-to-duct and duct-to-sheath were significantly higher in group B. Operating time was quite high in group B compared to group A (438 ± 72 minutes vs 420 ± 61 minutes, respectively; P = .05). Regarding biliary complications (n = 40, 23.2%), the rates of biliary leakage (n = 17, 9.9%) and strictures (n = 25, 14.5%) were similar in both groups (P = .164 and .773, respectively). CPS was positively correlated (for Child B and C, odds ratio [OR]: 10.669 and 17.866, respectively), whereas GRWR was negatively correlated (OR: 9.530) with biliary stricture. Increased risk for bile leakage was observed in younger donors (OR: .929). Although overall mortality rate was 9.8% (n = 17), only 5 of the patients (29%) died of biliary complications. Conclusion: The number of biliary ducts and anastomoses did not affect the rate of complications. However, CPS, GRWR, and young donor age were found to be predisposing factors for postoperative biliary complications. Mortality was mostly based on the causes other than biliary complications. © 2019 Elsevier Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier USAen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.160en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleDoes Multiple Bile Duct Anastomosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Affect the Postoperative Biliary Complications?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTransplantation Proceedingsen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempDBÜen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster