Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSaglam S.
dc.contributor.authorBugra D.
dc.contributor.authorSaglam E.K.
dc.contributor.authorAsoglu O.
dc.contributor.authorBalik E.
dc.contributor.authorYamaner S.
dc.contributor.authorBulut T.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T15:53:13Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T15:53:13Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2078-6891
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.025
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/1864
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: The optimum duration between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and transmesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer has not been defined yet. This randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy of four-week versus eight-week delay before surgery. Methods: One-hundred and fifty-three patients with locally advanced low- or mid-rectum rectal adenocarcinoma were included in this single center prospective randomized trial. Patients were assigned to receive surgical treatment after either four weeks or eight weeks of delay after chemoradiotherapy. Patients were followed for local recurrence and survival, and surgical specimens were examined for pathological staging and circumferential margin positivity. Results: 4-week and 8-week groups did not differ with regard to lateral surgical margin positivity (9.2% vs. 5.1%, P=0.33, respectively), pathological tumor regression rate (P=0.90), overall survival (5-year, 76.5% vs. 74.2%, P=0.60) and local recurrence rate (11.8% vs. 10.3%, 0.77). Overall survival was better in patients with negative surgical margins (78.8% vs. 53.0%, P=0.04). Local recurrence rate was significantly higher among patients with positive surgical margin (28.5% vs. 9.3%, P=0.02). Conclusions: Intentional prolongation of the chemoradiotherapy-surgery interval does not seem to improve clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Surgical margin positivity seems to be more important with this regard. © Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPioneer Bioscience Publishingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.025en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLocal controlen_US
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant radiochemotherapyen_US
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant-surgery intervalen_US
dc.subjectRectal carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectSurgical margin positivityen_US
dc.subjectSurvivalen_US
dc.titleFourth versus eighth week surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-01 studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Gastrointestinal Oncologyen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage9en_US
dc.identifier.endpage17en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempDBÜen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster