Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTavukcu, Hasan Hueyin
dc.contributor.authorAytac, Omer
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Numan Cem
dc.contributor.authorKulaksizoglu, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorAtug, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T15:56:08Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T15:56:08Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2149-3235
dc.identifier.issn2149-3057
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2017.35589
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/2226
dc.descriptionWOS: 000416270600014en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We investigated the effect of the use of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) on the dissection plan of the neurovascular bundle and the oncological results of our patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: We prospectively evaluated 60 consecutive patients, including 30 patients who had (Group 1), and 30 patients who had not (Group 2) mp-MRI before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Based on the findings of mp-MRI, the dissection plan was changed as intrafascial, interfascial, and extra-fascial in the mp-MRI group. Two groups were compared in terms of age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason sum scores and surgical margin positivity. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, PSA, biopsy Gleason score, final pathological Gleason score and surgical margin positivity. mp-MRI changed the initial surgical plan in 18 of 30 patients (60%) in Group 1. In seventeen of these patients (56%) surgical plan was changed from non-nerve sparing to interfascial nerve sparing plan. In one patient dissection plan was changed to non-nerve sparing technique which had extraprostatic extension on final pathology. Surgical margin positivity was similar in Groups 1, and 2 (16% and 13%, respectively) although, Group 1 had higher number of high-risk patients. mp-MRI confirmed the primary tumour localisation in the final pathology in 27 of of 30 patients (90%). Conclusion: Preoperative mp-MRI effected the decision to perform a nerve-sparing technique in 56% of the patients in our study; moreover, changing the dissection plan from non-nerve-sparing technique to a nerve sparing technique did not increase the rate of surgical margin positivity.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAVESen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tud.2017.35589en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDissectionen_US
dc.subjectmagnetic resonanceen_US
dc.subjectprostateen_US
dc.subjectprostatectomyen_US
dc.titleThe efficacy and utilisation of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it change the surgical dissection plan?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGYen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.startpage470en_US
dc.identifier.endpage475en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Tavukcu, Hasan Hueyin -- Aytac, Omer -- Kulaksizoglu, Haluk -- Atug, Fatih] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Balci, Numan Cem] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster