Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorKaradereler, Selhan
dc.contributor.authorCobanoglu, Mutlu
dc.contributor.authorYilar, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Levent Onur
dc.contributor.authorHamzaoglu, Azmi
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T15:57:13Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T15:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0940-6719
dc.identifier.issn1432-0932
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4484-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/2475
dc.descriptionWOS: 000377016500005en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27001135en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the changes in the vertebral body and spinal canal area in a group of patients who had pedicle screw fixation under age 5 for the treatment of congenital spinal deformity at least 5 year follow-up. 11 patients who had been operated due to spinal deformity under age 5 with who had a CT examination at least 5 years after the initial operation were included in the study. All patients underwent hemivertebrectomy and transpedicular fixation procedures at an average age of 3.18 years (range 2-5 years). All had preoperative CT to evaluate the congenital deformities. Measurements were done at the instrumented vertebrae as well as the un-instrumented ones above and below them to evaluate; vertebral body parameters, pedicle parameters and spinal canal area of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), upper adjacent un-instrumented vertebra and lower adjacent un-instrumented vertebra. The average follow-up was 7.2 (range 5-12) years. Six of the patients were over age 10 during the final CT examination while 5 were at age 7. Female-to male ratio was 8-3. Measurement of all the parameters in 22 instrumented and 22 non-instrumented segments showed a proportional increase rather than a decrease at each segment. The percentage of canal area growth at UIV and LIV was 21 and 17.5 %, respectively. Pedicle screw instrumentation has no adverse effect on further spinal body, pedicle and canal growth and does not result in iatrogenic spinal canal stenosis.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00586-016-4484-6en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSpinal canal growthen_US
dc.subjectPedicle screwen_US
dc.subjectHemivertebrectomyen_US
dc.titleDoes pedicle screw fixation under age 5 cause spinal canal narrowing? A CT study with minimum 5 years follow-upen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN SPINE JOURNALen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1665en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1673en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record