Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTufek, Ilter
dc.contributor.authorArgun, Burak
dc.contributor.authorAtug, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Mehmet Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorObek, Can
dc.contributor.authorCoskuner, Enis Rauf
dc.contributor.authorKural, Ali Riza
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T16:03:20Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T16:03:20Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/3061
dc.descriptionWOS: 000313582200009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 22788663en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To describe a novel technique to control dorsal vein complex (DVC) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and Methods: We have been using a laparoscopic bulldog clamp to control DVC before apical dissection and urethral division. Data of 50 patients who underwent DVC control with laparoscopic bulldog clamp (group 1) were retrospectively compared with 50 consecutive patients in whom DVC was controlled with suture ligation (group 2). In the bulldog and suture groups, 30 and 31 patients underwent concomitant bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), respectively. Operative and anastomosis time, estimated blood loss (EBL), apical surgical margin positivity, and early continence rates were evaluated. Results: Patients in the bulldog group had significantly shorter operative time compared with patients in the suture group (146.8 vs 178.4 min, P=0.0005). Anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the bulldog group (12.3 vs 15.5min, P=0.002). There was no difference in EBL between the groups (185 vs 184.2 mL). Immediate, postoperative first and third month continence rates were 62% vs 44%, 74% vs 60%, 90% vs 74% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although continence rates were better in favor of the bulldog group at each evaluation period, the difference did not reach statistical difference. None of the patients in both groups had apical surgical margin positivity. Conclusions: The use of a laparoscopic bulldog clamp to control DVC was associated with shorter operation and anastomosis time and a trend toward quicker recovery of continence. This technique provides clear vision during apical dissection and urethral division while potentially minimizing the external sphincteric trauma. Prospective randomized trials are needed for better evaluation of this technique.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMARY ANN LIEBERT INCen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2012.0013en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleThe Use of a Laparoscopic Bulldog Clamp to Control the Dorsal Vein Complex During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel Techniqueen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGYen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.startpage29en_US
dc.identifier.endpage33en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-4758-4069en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-2542-6289en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Tufek, Ilter -- Keskin, Mehmet Selcuk -- Coskuner, Enis Rauf] Istanbul Acibadem Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, TR-34457 Istanbul, Turkey -- [Argun, Burak -- Kural, Ali Riza] Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Atug, Fatih] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Obek, Can] Istanbul Univ, Dept Urol, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster