Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTufek, Ilter
dc.contributor.authorAkpinar, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorAtug, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorObek, Can
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Halil Erturk
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Mehmet Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorKural, Ali Riza
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T16:03:48Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T16:03:48Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0344
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/3168
dc.descriptionWOS: 000300392500015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 22092389en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the effect of equivalent doses of local anesthetic administered at different concentrations and volumes on pain scores in patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Patients and Methods: This study was a single-center, randomized trial. A total of 120 patients were randomized into two groups with 60 patients in each group. In group 1, 2.5 mL of 2% lidocaine (low volume-high concentration) and in group 2, 5 mL of 1% lidocaine (high volume-low concentration) was injected just lateral to the junction between the prostate base and seminal vesicle on each side under ultrasonographic guidance. Patients were given an 11 point visual analog scale (VAS) to evaluate the level of pain encountered during transrectal ultrasonographic (TRUS) probe insertion, injection of the local anesthetic, and the biopsy procedure. Results: In both groups, TRUS probe insertion was the most painful stage of the procedure. With regard to local anesthetic injection, the VAS pain score was significantly lower in group 1 (1.56 vs. 2.41, P = 0.001). Concerning sampling of the prostate, group 1 had a significantly lower VAS pain score compared with group 2 (1.71 vs. 2.48, P = 0.008). Neither major complications nor side effects related to local anesthetic absorption occurred in both groups. Conclusion: Low volume-high concentration lidocaine administration provides superior analgesia compared with high volume-low concentration lidocaine during transrectal biopsy of the prostate.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMARY ANN LIEBERT INCen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2011.0344en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleThe Impact of Local Anesthetic Volume and Concentration on Pain During Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGYen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.startpage174en_US
dc.identifier.endpage177en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-4758-4069en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-2542-6289en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Tufek, Ilter -- Keskin, Mehmet Selcuk] Istanbul Acibadem Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Akpinar, Haluk -- Atug, Fatih] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Obek, Can] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Esen, Halil Erturk] Istanbul Tech Univ, Inst Informat, Dept Computat Sci & Engn, TR-80626 Istanbul, Turkey -- [Kural, Ali Riza] Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster