dc.contributor.author | Bingol, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gunenc, Z. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gedikbasi, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Guner, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tasdemir, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tiras, B. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-13T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-13T16:04:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-13T12:10:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-13T16:04:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0144-3615 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2010.532246 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11446/3281 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000286898700012 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 21280995 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | We aimed to compare the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS), saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) and hysteroscopy (HS) for uterine pathologies among infertile women. A total of 346 patients were selected for operative hysteroscopy, following SIS after TVS. SIS was performed with a Cook Soft 500 IVF catheter. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated to compare the accuracy of TVS, SIS and hysteroscopy for uterine abnormalities. SIS showed a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 100% and PPV of 100% for endometrial hyperplasia, and a sensitivity and NPV of 100% for polypoid lesions. For submucosal myoma SIS showed a sensitivity of 99% with PPV of 96%. Hysteroscopy had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 98%, 83%, 96% and 91%, respectively for overall uterine pathologies. Finally, SIS seems to be superior to TVS, for uterine pathologies, with respect to hysteroscopy as the gold standard. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | INFORMA HEALTHCARE | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3109/01443615.2010.532246 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Accuracy | en_US |
dc.subject | fertility control | en_US |
dc.subject | HSG | en_US |
dc.subject | hysteroscopy | en_US |
dc.subject | SIS | en_US |
dc.subject | TVS | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | en_US |
dc.department | DBÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 54 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 58 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.department-temp | [Bingol, B.] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hosp, IVF Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Gunenc, Z.] Istanbul Maltepe Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Gedikbasi, A.] Istanbul Bakirkoy Matern & Children Dis Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey -- [Guner, H. -- Tiras, B.] Gazi Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ankara, Turkey -- [Tasdemir, S.] IVF Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey | en_US |