Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCaynak, Baris
dc.contributor.authorSagbas, Ertan
dc.contributor.authorOnan, Burak
dc.contributor.authorOnan, Ismihan Selen
dc.contributor.authorSen, Onur
dc.contributor.authorBayramoglu, Zehra
dc.contributor.authorAkpinar, Belhhan
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T16:04:51Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-13T16:04:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0886-0440
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00928.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/3384
dc.descriptionWOS: 000271523400027en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 19754676en_US
dc.description.abstractP>Background: Degenerative ascending aortic aneurysms frequently present with aortic valve pathology. If only the noncoronary sinus of Valsalva is dilated, replacement of the noncoronary sinus by tailoring the supracoronary graft with or without aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be a simple operation strategy. We sought to describe our experiences in this kind of operation, and compare them with a relatively homogeneous group of patients who underwent the classical Bentall operation. Methods: Between January 1997 and June 2007, 99 patients who had dilated ascending aortas with root dilatation and aortic valve pathology underwent operation. Patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical procedure. Classical Bentall operation was applied in 54 patients with dilated sinuses (Group 1). The other patients with dilated noncoronary sinus underwent either ascending aortic replacement with noncoronary sinus replacement (NSR, n = 27) (Group 2), or separate AVR and ascending aortic replacement with NSR (AVR + NSR, n = 18) (Group 3). Results: There were significant reduction of aortic root in Group 2 (Z = -4.560, p < 0.001), and Group 3 (Z = -3.758, p < 0.001). Degree of aortic regurgitation was decreased from 1.56 +/- 0.5 to 0.67 +/- 0.5 postoperatively in Group 2 (Z = -3.874, p < 0.001). Hospital mortality was six (6.1%) (three in Group 1; three in Group 2). Late mortality rate was 6.1% (three in Group 1, three in Group 2). The type of operation was not found to be an independent predictor of overall mortality. No patients in the NSR and AVR-NSR groups had aortic root aneurysm, and there were no reoperations or verified deaths caused by aortic root aneurysm in these patients. Conclusions: Noncoronary cusp replacement for aortic root remodeling in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm is a technically simple and durable operation. Short- and mid-term results of this method were favorable compared to the Bentall procedure. (J Card Surg 2009;24:710-715).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMedtronicen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDisclosures: Dr. Akpinar discloses a financial relationship with Medtronic.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INCen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00928.xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of Three Different Surgical Methods in Aortic Root Aneurysms: Long-Term Resultsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERYen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.startpage710en_US
dc.identifier.endpage715en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Caynak, Baris] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Florence Nightingale Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Klinigi, TR-34381 Istanbul, Turkeyen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster