Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMathew, Roshen
dc.contributor.authorHibare, Kedar
dc.contributor.authorDalar, Levent
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Winnie Elma
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T18:01:23Z
dc.date.available2020-12-02T18:01:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2072-1439
dc.identifier.issn2077-6624
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2080
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/3594
dc.descriptionWOS: 000583404900028en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 33209383en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Tracheobronchial stents types, uses, techniques for deployment and extraction have practice variations around the world. Methods: We collected responses by sending an online survey of 8 questions to world interventional bronchology member societies and social media groups. Results: There were 269 respondents from 47 countries. Europe had 97 respondents from 22 countries. There were 8 respondents from Australia, 7 from Africa (3 countries) and 7 from 4 countries in South America (SA). North America (NA) had 72 respondents from 3 countries. Asia had 78 respondents from 14 countries. For stent placements 15% [41] used fiberoptic bronchoscope (FB) only. Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) was solely utilized by 38% [102]. Forty-six percent [123] used a combination of RB and FB (P value <0.00001). For stent extraction 13% [19] used FB alone, 57% [85] used RB, and 36% [54] used a combination of RB and FB (P value <0.00001). Placement of stents were 50.5% [135] only by direct visualization. Twenty-three percent [61] always used fluoroscopic guidance. Twenty-six-point-five percent [71] used fluoroscopy in certain cases (P value <0.00001). Sixty percent [162] decided stent sizing by measurements of stenotic and non-stenotic areas on radiology. Twelve percent [32] respondents used sizing devices. Sixty-five percent [177] used a ruler and bronchoscope to measure stenotic areas. Thirty-eight percent [104] used visual estimation and experience. Seven percent [19] used serial balloon dilatation size. To prevent clogging of stents, 22% [59] prescribed mucolytics. Seventy-three percent [195] nebulized saline, 26% [70] had Mucomyst Nebulization, 24% [65] Nebulized bronchodilators and other methods 11% [30] were advised. Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) 44% was the commonest type of stent used around the world. Silicone stents 37%, Y stents 15%, uncovered SEMS 12%, Montgomery T tube 5% followed. Polyflex stents 3% and custom-made stents 3% were least used. Biodegradable stents were used by 7.5%, and not used by 92.5%. Conclusions: Tracheobronchial stent practice norms have slowly evolved, but its practice variations lack uniformity, and have sparse evidence-based studies for its direction.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAme Publ Coen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/jtd-20-2080en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTracheobronchial stentsen_US
dc.subjectinterventional pulmonologyen_US
dc.subjectbiodegradable stentsen_US
dc.subjectrigid bronchoscopyen_US
dc.subjectfluoroscopyen_US
dc.titleTracheobronchial stent sizing and deployment practices airway stenting practices around the world: a survey studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Thoracic Diseaseen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage5495en_US
dc.identifier.endpage+en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Mathew, Roshen] Huntsville Dist Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, UAB Sch Med, Huntsville, AL USA; [Hibare, Kedar] Narayana Hlth, Dept Intervent Pulmonol, Bangalore, Karnataka, India; [Dalar, Levent] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pulm Med, Istanbul, Turkey; [Roy, Winnie Elma] UAB Sch Publ Hlth, Birmingham, AL USAen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster