Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSelver, Ozlem Barut
dc.contributor.authorGurdal, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYagci, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorEgrilmez, Sait
dc.contributor.authorPalamar, Melis
dc.contributor.authorCavusoglu, Turker
dc.contributor.authorWolosin, J. Mario
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T18:01:26Z
dc.date.available2020-12-02T18:01:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1471-2415
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01588-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/3617
dc.descriptionGurdal, Mehmet/0000-0003-1226-1737en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000561115700003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 32762738en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground the sparsity of established tools for the grading of limbal stem cell deficiency hinder objective assessments of the clinical outcome of cultivated limbal epithelial cell transplantation. To advance towards the development of standards for the comparison of the outcomes of these bio-surgical protocols we have now applied a battery of recognized objective and patient-declared subjective outcome criteria to the autologous modality of cultivated limbal epithelial cell transplantation. Methods the prospective study involved ten patients (M/F = 9/1; mean age = 42.1 years) displaying overt unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency complying with the inclusion criteria described in Methods. Limbal biopsies were obtained from the contralateral eye and their outgrowths after 2-week cultures were transplanted on the affected eye after pannus resection. Outcomes were followed up for 12 months. the objective tests were scores for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); using the LogMAR scale, a multiparametric ocular surface score (OSS), and the Schirmer's test. Subjective scores were based on patient answers to a) perception of visual improvement/pain; b) the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25); and c) the 12-item Ocular Surface Disease Index Questionnaire (OSDI). All procedures were performed under good manufacture practices using solely xeno-free reagents. in all cases, a single biopsy was divided into two pieces and they were expanded in order to prevent outgrowth failure. in 5 patients, both biopsies generated healthy culture sheet. in those cases the lesser outgrowth were used for immune-histological characterization. Results the experimental parallel outgrowth samples showed a similar percent of p63 alpha(+)cells. PreOp and 12-month PostOp BCVAs and OSSs were, respectively, 1.15 +/- 0.70; 0.21 +/- 0.13 and 7.40 +/- 2.01; 2,30 +/- 1.30, (p < 0.05). Patient's responses to all three question sets except ocular pain were consistent with significant improvement (p < 0.05). Conclusion Objective clinical metrics demonstrate that in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency, cultivated limbal epithelial cell transplantation improves vision and ocular surface health and subjective visual perceptions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [115S423]; USPHSUnited States Public Health Service [RO1-EY 029279, RO1-EY014878]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOBS: the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)(Project number:115S423); JMW: USPHS RO1-EY 029279 and RO1-EY014878.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBmcen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12886-020-01588-6en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCultured limbal epithelial cell transplantationen_US
dc.subjectLimbal stem cell deficiencyen_US
dc.subjectOcular surface parameteren_US
dc.subjectVisual function-related quality of lifeen_US
dc.titleMulti-parametric evaluation of autologous cultivated Limbal epithelial cell transplantation outcomes of Limbal stem cell deficiency due to chemical burnen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalBmc Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Selver, Ozlem Barut; Yagci, Ayse; Egrilmez, Sait; Palamar, Melis] Ege Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Fac Med, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey; [Gurdal, Mehmet] Ege Univ, Dept Med Biochem, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey; [Cavusoglu, Turker] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Dept Histol, Izmir, Turkey; [Cavusoglu, Turker] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Dept Embryol, Izmir, Turkey; [Veral, Ali] Ege Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey; [Guven, Cagri] Ege Univ, Dept Gynecol, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey; [Guven, Cagri] Ege Univ, Dept Obstet, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey; [Ates, Utku] Bilim Univ, Dept Histol & Embryol, Istanbul, Turkey; [Wang, Zheng; Wolosin, J. Mario] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Ophthalmol, Box 1183,One Gustave Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA; [Wang, Zheng; Wolosin, J. Mario] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Stem Cell Inst, Box 1183,One Gustave Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USAen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster