Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Fahrettin
dc.contributor.authorEren, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorTunç, Necmettin
dc.contributor.authorVelidedeoğlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBakan, Selim
dc.contributor.authorAydoğan, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Mehmet Halit
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T18:11:56Z
dc.date.available2020-12-02T18:11:56Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2149-1976
dc.identifier.issn2149-1976
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr//makale/TVRnMk16ZzBOQT09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/4203
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study to present the results of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided cutting needle biopsy procedures of suspicious breast lesions that can be solely detected on Magnetic resonance (MR) examination. Materials and Methods: The study included 48 patients with 48 lesions which were solely be observed in breast MRI, indistinguishable in ultrasonography and mammography, for MR guided vacuum-assisted cutting needle biopsy and 42 patients with 42 lesions for MR guided cutting needle biopsy for the lesions of the same nature. MR imaging was performed using a 1.5-Tesla MRI device. Acquired MR images were determined and biopsy protocol was performed using computer-aided diagnosis system on the workstation. Vacuum biopsies were performed using 10 G or 12 G automatic biopsy systems, cutting needle biopsy procedures were performed using fully automated 12 G biopsy needle. Results: All biopsy procedures were finalized successfully without major complications. The lesions were 54 mass (60%), 28 were non-mass contrast enhancement (31%) and 8 were foci (9%) in the MR examination. Histopathological evaluation revealed 18 malignant (invasive, in-situ ductal carcinoma and lobular carcinoma), 66 benign (apocrine metaplasia, fibrosis, fibroadenomatoid lesion, sclerosing adenosis, fibrocystic disease and mild-to-severe epithelial proliferation) and 6 high-risk (atypical ductal hyperplasia, intraductal papilloma, radial scar) lesions. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance guided vacuum and cutting needle biopsy methods are successful methods fort he evaluation of solely MRI detected suspicious breast lesions. There are several advantages relative to each other in both methods.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCerrahien_US
dc.titleMagnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Vacuum Assisted and Core Needle Biopsiesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Breast Healthen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage25en_US
dc.identifier.endpage30en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempİstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye;Memorial Hastanesi, Radyoloji Kliniği, Diyarbakır, Türkiye;İstanbul Üniversitesi, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Üniversitesi, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Üniversitesi, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Üniversitesi, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiyeen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster