Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaracoglu, Ayten
dc.contributor.authorLerman, Jerrold
dc.contributor.authorKafali, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorCanaz, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorSaracoglu, Kemal T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-29T16:52:22Z
dc.date.available2022-01-29T16:52:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1642-5758
dc.identifier.issn1731-2531
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2021.108561
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/4445
dc.description.abstractBackground: Both the Miller and Macintosh blades are commonly used during laryngoscopy in infants and children, although the glottic views have not been compared in neonates. This study compared the glottic views with the Miller and Macintosh size 0 blades in neonates when the blades were placed above and below the epiglottis. Methods: Forty anaesthetized and paralyzed neonates undergoing elective surgery were enrolled and randomized to either the Miller or Macintosh size 0 blade. Two glottic views were obtained in random order in each neonate and were photographed using the same blade: lifting the epiglottis first then the tongue base or vice versa. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores were evaluated with each view. The POGO scores and cardiorespiratory variables were then analysed. Results: The POGO scores using the Miller blade to lift both the epiglottis and the tongue base were similar, whereas the scores using the Macintosh blade to lift the epiglottis were greater than those to lift the tongue base. The POGO scores using the Miller blade in both positions were significantly greater than those using the Macintosh blade in the corresponding positions (P = 0.0001). The heart rate using the Miller blade was greater than that using the Macintosh blade (P = 0.0001). Conclusions: In neonates, the glottic views using the Miller size 0 blade to lift both the epiglottis and the tongue base were deemed to be excellent and superior to those using the Macintosh blade in both positions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5114/ait.2021.108561
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectneonateen_US
dc.subjectlaryngoscopeen_US
dc.subjectlaryngoscopyen_US
dc.subjectglottic viewen_US
dc.subjectLaryngoscopyen_US
dc.subjectResuscitationen_US
dc.subjectIntubationen_US
dc.subjectPercentageen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectInfantsen_US
dc.titleGlottic views using a Miller size 0 blade are superior to those from a Macintosh size 0 blade in neonates: a randomized trialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAnaesthesiology Intensive Therapyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.startpage246en_US
dc.identifier.endpage251en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record