Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemirel, M.
dc.contributor.authorKendirci, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorSaglam, Y.
dc.contributor.authorErgin, O.N.
dc.contributor.authorSen, C.
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, I.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T19:55:50Z
dc.date.available2022-11-04T19:55:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0001-5415
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/4643
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE OF THE STUDY The literature is conflicting as to whether the high hip center (HHC) reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an ideal option for patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to compare the mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes of THA using HHC versus anatomical hip center (AHC) technique in Crowe types II and III DDH. Our hypothesis was that there may be no differences in terms of functional and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent THA using HHC or AHC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients who underwent a primary THA due to Crowe type-II or type-III DDH were retrospectively reviewed and included. Patients were divided into two groups as per the hip center reconstruction: Group A (AHC technique) and group H (HHC technique). A cementless cup was inserted in 25 hips (19 female, 6 male; mean age = 51 years, age range = 28-67)) at near-AHC in group A and 32 hips (22 female, 10 male; mean age = 53 years, age range = 29-68) at HHC position in group H. To assess clinical status, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used at the final follow-up. In radiographical assessment, component loosening and osseointegration of the acetabular cup were examined on follow-up radiographs. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 25-84) in group A and 40 months (range, 24-86) in group H. The mean HHS was 83 (range, 74-91) in group A and 83.6 (range, 73-94) in group H (p = 0.741). Osteolysis was determined in three patients from each group. The other 51 cups demonstrated a minimum of one radiographic sign of osseointegration. Although the overall complication rate was higher in group A (64%) than in group H (46%), this difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS The HHC technique using cementless acetabular fixation seems to be a valuable alternative option to AHC technique in cases of Crowe types II and III DDH. Key words: High hip center; anatomical hip center; center of rotation; total hip arthroplasty; dysplastic hip; developmental dysplasia of the hip; Crowe type II; Crowe Type III.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovacaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectcongenital hip dislocationen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjecthip prosthesisen_US
dc.subjecthip replacementen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectArthroplasty, Replacement, Hipen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental Dysplasia of the Hipen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHip Dislocation, Congenitalen_US
dc.subjectHip Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titlePorovnání technik High Hip Center a anatomické rekonstrukce v léčbě VDK typu Crowe II a III: retrospektivní klinická studieen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparison of High Hip Center versus Anatomical Reconstruction Technique in Crowe Types II and III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: a Retrospective Clinical Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.startpage272en_US
dc.identifier.endpage278en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempDemirel, M., Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyIstanbul, Turkey; Kendirci, A.S., Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyIstanbul, Turkey; Saglam, Y., Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyIstanbul, Turkey; Ergin, O.N., Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyIstanbul, Turkey; Sen, C., Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyIstanbul, Turkey; Öztürk, I., Demiroglu Bilim University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyIstanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.pmid36055667en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137153733en_US
dc.authorscopusid57033839500
dc.authorscopusid57200938750
dc.authorscopusid57069951300
dc.authorscopusid25521462400
dc.authorscopusid7103412927
dc.authorscopusid7005055908


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster