Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIris, Nur Efe
dc.contributor.authorGunver, Mehmet Guven
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-04T13:29:50Z
dc.date.available2024-02-04T13:29:50Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1304-2947
dc.identifier.issn1307-9948
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.29400/tjgeri.2023.365
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/4766
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In the absence of typical overt symptoms, diagnosis of urinary tract infection is more difficult in elderly individuals. This study investigated the benefits of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and leukocyte levels in supporting the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in the elderly and causative factors.Materials and Method: A retrospective examination of information from a hospital data system of patients > 65 years of age, who were diagnosed with urinary tract infection in a 4-year period, was performed. Bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed.Results: In the case group, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels were higher than those in the control group, and a moderately positive correlation with urinary tract infection was found (p<0.001, r=0.454). Although procalcitonin was a better predictor than C-reactive protein , the risk criteria for C-reactive protein were also very close to those of procalcitonin. The cut-off values for C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were 6.93 mg/L and 0.075 ng/ml, respectively, and C-reactive protein levels were normal in 20% of cases. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Escherichia coli (56%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (16%). The extended-spectrum beta-lactamase rate was 35% for E. coli and 43% for K. pneumoniae isolates. Fosfomycin and ertapenem were the most effective antibiotics.Conclusion: Procalcitonin levels were high; however, the fact that C-reactive protein was found to be normal in one-fifth of cases should serve as a warning that urinary system infection can be missed in elderly patients in cases in which only C-reactive protein level is evaluated.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Geriatrics Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Geriatrics-Turk Geriatri Dergisien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.29400/tjgeri.2023.365
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectDrug Resistanceen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Tract Infectionsen_US
dc.subjectC-Reactive Proteinen_US
dc.subjectProcalcitoninen_US
dc.subjectLeukocytesen_US
dc.titleARE C-REACTIVE PROTEIN AND PROCALCITONIN EFFECTIVE BIOMARKERS FOR URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS? WHAT SHOULD BE ADMINISTERED FOR EMPIRICIAL TREATMENT?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.startpage377en_US
dc.identifier.endpage385en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Iris, Nur Efe] Demiroglu Bilim Univ, Med Fac, Infect Dis & Clin Microbiol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Gunver, Mehmet Guven] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Biostat, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.authoridGunver, Mehmet Guven/0000-0002-4628-8391
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180851450en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001134752500002en_US
dc.authorwosidGunver, Mehmet Guven/AAD-1784-2020


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record