Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAkyurek, Muhlik
dc.contributor.authorKoraman, Emre
dc.contributor.authorIyetin, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorAkan, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-04T13:29:55Z
dc.date.available2024-02-04T13:29:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5674
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/4786
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: Impacted valgus proximal humerus fracture has been known to be challenging in terms of treatment and outcomes since it was defined. Moreover, it is a type of fracture that is difficult to treat. In addition, exact limits have not yet been determined regarding which parameters affect patients' functional and reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiological results of patients with impacted valgus proximal humerus fractures treated conservatively and surgically and to evaluate the effect of these radiological parameters on functional outcomes.Materials and methods: A total of 79 patients who were treated between 2015 and 2021 with a diagnosis of impacted valgus fracture were evaluated retrospectively. Patients treated conservatively (Group 1) and surgically (Group 2) were evaluated in terms of radiological measurements (tubercle displacement (TD), cephalodiaphyseal angle (CDA), medial hinge (MH), cephaloglenoid angle (CGA), medial hinge impaction (MHI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant Shoulder Score, and functional outcomes (range of motion). The effect of radiological parameters on clinical outcomes was analyzed by a correlation test. Results: In the postoperative period, the ASES and Constant scores of the patients in Group 2 were significantly higher than those of the patients in Group 1. Additionally, Group 2 had better results in terms of passive extension, active internal rotation, and active/passive external rotation. Patients in both groups exhibited improvements in radiological parameters, and the correlation test showed that MH and MHI were mostly related to ASES and Constant scores. Conclusion: The monitoring and treatment of impacted valgus proximal humerus fractures remain controversial. Although radiological parameters are a guide for orthopedic surgeons, the limits have not been clearly defined. In this study, in addition to all parameters, the effect of MH and MHI on functional results was emphasized.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.55730/1300-0144.5674
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectImpacted valgusen_US
dc.subjectfunctional resultsen_US
dc.subjectradiological resultsen_US
dc.subjectmedial hinge integrityen_US
dc.subjecttreatment decisionen_US
dc.titleShould valgus-impacted proximal humerus fractures necessarily be operated on? Radiological versus functional resultsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1094en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1104en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Akyurek, Muhlik] Maria Josef Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Greven, Germany; [Koraman, Emre] Demiroglu Bilim Univ, Fac Med, Kadikoy Florence Nightingale Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Iyetin, Yusuf] Pendik Bolge Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Akan, Mehmet] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin City Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175651781en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001108669900049en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster