Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAkçakaya M.O.
dc.contributor.authorAşir A.
dc.contributor.authorÇömlek S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-04T13:30:22Z
dc.date.available2024-02-04T13:30:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn13010336
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/jtss.galenos.2023.03522
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1165509
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/4905
dc.description.abstractObjective: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a narrowing of the canal diameter due to degenerative changes, particularly in elderly individuals. This narrowing sometimes accompanies foraminal stenosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of caudal and combined caudal/transforaminal adhesiolysis for treating symptomatic LSS patients. Materials and Methods: Patients between the ages of 48-74, whose diagnosis was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging were included in the study. The gender distribution was kept the same in both groups. The procedure was initially performed through the caudal way in all patients. Patients, with no evidence of foraminal passage in epidurography were categorized in group 2 as a combined caudal and transforaminal adhesiolysis groups. A total of 80 patients (40 patients in each group) were included in this study. Pain relief was evaluated using the walking distance, visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before the procedure (baseline) and at the second week, the third and the sixth months after the procedure. Results: Baseline VAS values were found to be at least 5 and higher in the patients without foraminal passage by epidurography. These values were present in 35% of the patients in the caudal group. The increase in walking distance was similar in both groups (72.5% in the caudal group and 75% in the combined group). The improvement in VAS was significant in the combined group, and was observed in 39 of 40 patients. The improvement in ODI was 97.5% in both groups. No complications were encountered during and after the procedures. Conclusion: Caudal neuroplasty adhesiolysis is an effective method for treating chronic low back pain due to symptomatic LSS and its effectiveness is increased when adding a transforaminal procedures in cases with no foraminal passage in epidurography. © Copyright 2023 by the Turkish Spine Society.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Turkish Spinal Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/jtss.galenos.2023.03522
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectadhesiolysisen_US
dc.subjectcaudalen_US
dc.subjecthypertonic sodium chloride solutionen_US
dc.subjectneurogenic claudicationen_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous neuroplastyen_US
dc.subjectSymptomatic lumbar spinal stenosisen_US
dc.subjecttransforaminal hyaluronidaseen_US
dc.subjecthyaluronidaseen_US
dc.subjectlidocaineen_US
dc.subjectmethylprednisoloneen_US
dc.subjecttriamcinoloneen_US
dc.subjectadhesiolysisen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectanalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectanesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectanteroposterior fluoroscopyen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectcombined caudal/transforaminal neuroplasty adhesiolysisen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic procedureen_US
dc.subjectepidural spaceen_US
dc.subjectepidurographyen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfluoroscopyen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectlateral fluoroscopyen_US
dc.subjectlow back painen_US
dc.subjectlumbar spinal stenosisen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectneurogenic claudicationen_US
dc.subjectneurologic examinationen_US
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectOswestry Disability Indexen_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous caudal neuroplasty adhesiolysisen_US
dc.subjectsuperior articular processen_US
dc.subjectsurgical approachen_US
dc.subjectsurgical techniqueen_US
dc.subjectvisual analog scaleen_US
dc.subjectwalking distanceen_US
dc.titleEVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF PERCUTANEOUS CAUDAL AND COMBINED CAUDAL/TRANSFORAMINAL NEUROPLASTYADESIOLYSIS FOR TREATING SYMPTOMATIC LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSISen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.startpage61en_US
dc.identifier.endpage70en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempAkçakaya, M.O., Demiro?lu Bilim University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Aşir, A., Ataşehir Florence Nightingale Hospital, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Çömlek, S., Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85156092540en_US
dc.authorscopusid57241760900
dc.authorscopusid26767452100
dc.authorscopusid57215657072
dc.identifier.trdizinid1165509en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster