Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMuslumanoglu, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorCabioglu, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorIgci, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorKaranlik, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorKocer, Havva Belma
dc.contributor.authorSenol, Kazim
dc.contributor.authorMantoglu, Baris
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-12T18:54:59Z
dc.date.available2025-01-12T18:54:59Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35610
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/5028
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial for patients with residual axillary disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), regardless of the residual burden. This study evaluated the oncologic safety and factors associated with outcomes in patients with residual axillary disease. These patients were treated solely with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), without ALND, after NAC.MethodsA joint analysis of two different multicenter cohorts-the retrospective cohort registry MF18-02 and the prospective observational cohort registry MF18-03 (NCT04250129)-was conducted between January 2004 and August 2022. All patients received regional nodal irradiation.ResultsFive hundred and one patients with cT1-4, N1-3M0 disease who achieved a complete clinical response to NAC underwent either SLNB alone (n = 353) or TAD alone (n = 148). At a median follow-up of 42 months, axillary and locoregional recurrence rates were 0.4% (n = 2) and 0.8% (n = 4). No significant difference was found in disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates between patients undergoing TAD alone versus SLNB alone, those with breast positive versus negative pathologic complete response, SLN methodology, total metastatic LN of one versus >= 2, or metastasis types as isolated tumor cells with micrometastases versus macrometastases. In the multivariate analysis, patients with nonluminal pathology were more likely to have a worse DFS and DSS, respectively, without an increased axillary recurrence.ConclusionsThe omission of ALND can be safely considered for patients who achieve a complete clinical response after NAC, even if residual disease is detected by pathologic examination. Provided that adjuvant radiotherapy is administered, neither the SLNB method nor the number of excised LNs significantly affects oncologic outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCanceren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.35610
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectaxillary lymph node dissectionen_US
dc.subjectbreast canceren_US
dc.subjectneoadjuvant chemotherapyen_US
dc.subjectsentinel lymph node biopsyen_US
dc.subjecttargeted axillary dissectionen_US
dc.subjectSentinel Nodeen_US
dc.subjectBiopsyen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectMulticenteren_US
dc.titleCombined analysis of the MF18-02/MF18-03 NEOSENTITURK studies: ypN-positive disease does not necessitate axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer with a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as long as radiotherapy is provideden_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume131en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Muslumanoglu, Mahmut; Cabioglu, Neslihan; Igci, Abdullah; Tukenmez, Mustafa; Emiroglu, Selman; Mollavelioglu, Baran; Ozcinar, Beyza; Kilic, Halime Gul; Ozmen, Vahit] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Karanlik, Hasan; Bademler, Suleyman] Istanbul Univ, Inst Oncol, Surg Oncol Unit, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Kocer, Havva Belma] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Sakarya, Turkiye; [Senol, Kazim; Aljorani, Israa] Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Bursa, Turkiye; [Mantoglu, Baris] Sakarya Univ, Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sakarya, Turkiye; [Cakmak, Guldeniz Karadeniz] Bulent Ecevit Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Zonguldak, Turkiye; [Ozkurt, Enver; Zer, Leyla] Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Gulcelik, Mehmet Ali; Akgul, Gokhan Giray] Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Dept Paediat Oncolog, Ankara, Turkiye; [Yildirim, Nilufer] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Med, Dept Nucl Med, Ankara, Turkiye; [Zengel, Baha] Izmir Bozyaka Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Izmir, Turkiye; [Trabulus, Didem Can] Bahcesehir Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ugurlu, Mustafa Umit] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Breast & Endocrine Surg Unit, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Uen_US
dc.authoridCelik, Burak/0000-0002-8626-7675
dc.authoridMantoglu, Baris/0000-0002-2161-3629
dc.authoridMollavelioglu, Baran/0000-0003-3152-044X
dc.authoridkocer, belma/0000-0002-9888-0661
dc.identifier.pmid39476303en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85208071245en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001347518000001en_US
dc.authorwosidBademler, Süleyman/AAY-4675-2020
dc.authorwosidVELİDEDEOĞLU, MEHMET/AAY-9588-2020
dc.authorwosidyılmaz, ravza/HKF-7012-2023
dc.authorwosidArici, Cumhur/C-7103-2016
dc.authorwosidMollavelioglu, Baran/AAT-7068-2020
dc.authorwosidIbis, Kamuran/AAD-1939-2019
dc.authorwosidUtkan, nihat/G-3597-2018
dc.authorscopusid15045176000
dc.authorscopusid56037273500
dc.authorscopusid6603880221
dc.authorscopusid6508305875
dc.authorscopusid57188762686
dc.authorscopusid55632701500
dc.authorscopusid57219718096


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster