Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAlibaz-Öner, F.
dc.contributor.authorKelesoglu, B.
dc.contributor.authorBalci, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorYardimci, G.K.
dc.contributor.authorArmağan, B.
dc.contributor.authorKiliç, L.
dc.contributor.authorKarakaş, Ö.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-12T18:55:01Z
dc.date.available2025-01-12T18:55:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1213-8118
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/zr7s0g
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/5038
dc.description.abstractObjective Glucocorticoids (GC) are widely accepted as the standard first-line treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, relapse rates are reported up to 80% on GC-only protocol arms in controlled trials of tocilizumab and abatacept in 12-24 months. Herein, we aimed to assess the real-life relapse rates retrospectively in patients with GCA from Turkey. Methods We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with GCA diagnosed according to ACR 1990 criteria from tertiary rheumatology centres in Turkey. All clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Relapse was defined as any new manifestation or increased acute-phase response leading to the change of the GC dose or use of a new therapeutic agent by the treating physician. Results The study included 330 (F/M: 196/134) patients with GCA. The mean age at disease onset was 68.9±9 years. The most frequent symptom was headache. Polymyalgia rheumatica was also present in 81 (24.5%) patients. Elevation of acute phase reactants (ESR>50 mm/h or CRP>5 mg/l) was absent in 25 (7.6%) patients at diagnosis. Temporal artery biopsy was available in 241 (73%) patients, and 180 of them had positive histopathological findings for GCA. For remission induction, GC pulses (250-1000 methylprednisolone mg/3-7 days) were given to 69 (20.9%) patients, with further 0.5-1 mg/kg/day prednisolone continued in the whole group. Immunosuppressives as GC-sparing agents were used in 252 (76.4%) patients. During a follow-up of a median 26.5 (6-190) months, relapses occurred in 49 (18.8%) patients. No confounding factor was observed in relapse rates. GC treatment could be stopped in only 62 (23.8%) patients. Additionally, GC-related side effects developed in 64 (24.6%) patients, and 141 (66.2%) had at least one Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) damage item present during follow-up. Conclusion In this first multi-centre series of GCA from Turkey, we observed that only one-fifth of patients had relapses during a mean follow-up of 26 months, with 76.4% given a GC-sparing IS agent at diagnosis. At the end of follow-up, GC-related side effects developed in one-fourth of patients. Our results suggest that patients with GCA had a low relapse rate in real-life experience of a multi-centre retrospective Turkish registry, however with a significant presence of GC-associated side effects during follow-up. © 2024 Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherClinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Rheumatologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.55563/clinexprheumatol/zr7s0g
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectgiant cell arteritisen_US
dc.subjectglucocorticoid sparing agentsen_US
dc.subjectglucocorticoidsen_US
dc.subjectrelapse rateen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGiant Cell Arteritisen_US
dc.subjectGlucocorticoidsen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectImmunosuppressive Agentsen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectRecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectRegistriesen_US
dc.subjectRemission Inductionen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectacute phase proteinen_US
dc.subjectglucocorticoiden_US
dc.subjectmethotrexateen_US
dc.subjectmethylprednisoloneen_US
dc.subjecttocilizumaben_US
dc.subjectglucocorticoiden_US
dc.subjectimmunosuppressive agenten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectblood vessel biopsyen_US
dc.subjectcohort analysisen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjectgiant cell arteritisen_US
dc.subjectheadacheen_US
dc.subjecthistopathologyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjecthuman tissueen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmedical recorden_US
dc.subjectrecurrence risken_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.subjectrheumatic polymyalgiaen_US
dc.subjecttertiary care centeren_US
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)en_US
dc.subjectclinical trialen_US
dc.subjectgiant cell arteritisen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectmulticenter studyen_US
dc.subjectrecurrent diseaseen_US
dc.subjectregisteren_US
dc.subjectremissionen_US
dc.subjecttime factoren_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectturkey (bird)en_US
dc.subjectvery elderlyen_US
dc.titleLow relapse rate in patients with giant cell arteritis in a multi-centre retrospective Turkish Registryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.startpage816en_US
dc.identifier.endpage821en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempAlibaz-Öner F., Marmara University School of Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Istanbul, Turkey; Kelesoglu B., Ankara University School of Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey; Balci M.A., Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Clinic of Rheumatology, Istanbul, Turkey; Yardimci G.K., Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey; Armağan B., Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey, Health Sciences University, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Clinic of Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey; Kiliç L., Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey; Karakaş Ö., Health Sciences University, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Clinic of Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey; Erden A., Health Sciences University, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Clinic of Rheumatology, Ankara, Turkey; Bilge S.Y., Eskisehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Esen_US
dc.identifier.pmid37976117en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191899080en_US
dc.authorscopusid15724627900
dc.authorscopusid57225151908
dc.authorscopusid56875260600
dc.authorscopusid57204450042
dc.authorscopusid55578288000
dc.authorscopusid53865075100
dc.authorscopusid57221126888


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster