Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUslu, S.
dc.contributor.authorGülle, S.
dc.contributor.authorSen, G.
dc.contributor.authorCapar, S.
dc.contributor.authorSenel, S.
dc.contributor.authorDalkılıc, E.
dc.contributor.authorAkar, S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-12T18:55:03Z
dc.date.available2025-01-12T18:55:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2673-7426
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237266
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/5046
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: CT-P13 is a biosimilar version of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody. In individuals with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), CT-P13 has been shown to be effective and to have a well-tolerated safety profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term drug persistence, safety, and efficacy of infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with AS undergoing first-line (1st-line) and later (?2nd-line) treatment in clinical practice. Methods: We performed an observational cohort study that included AS patients based on the biological drug database in the TURKBIO Registry between 2014 and 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving CT-P13 as first-line treatment or as a switch (?2nd-line) from another TNF inhibitor (TNFi). Standard disease activity metrics were used to assess the effectiveness of CT-P13, and drug retention rates were investigated. Results: There were 179 AS patients using CT-P13 (47.4% male, mean age: 42.9 ± 11.3 years). Of these patients, 123 (68.7%) were receiving CT-P13 as a first-line treatment. The mean length of treatment was 3.5 years. CT-P13 drug retention rates in the general patient population were 58.6% and 48.2% in the first-line and ?second-line treatment, respectively, after 3 years of follow-up. The most common reason for CT-P13 treatment discontinuation was lack of efficacy. The first-line CT-P13 group had statistically substantially higher ASAS20/40 response rates at three and six months. Nonetheless, both groups’ response rates at one year were comparable. Conclusions: In this real-world data analysis, AS patients who were TNFi naïve (1st-line) and subsequently treated (?2nd-line) with CT-P13 showed encouraging drug retention rates with acceptable long-term effectiveness and safety. © 2024 by the authors.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm13237266
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnkylosing spondylitisen_US
dc.subjectbiosimilaren_US
dc.subjectcohorten_US
dc.subjectCT-P13en_US
dc.subjectinfliximaben_US
dc.subjectTURKBIOen_US
dc.subjectadalimumaben_US
dc.subjectcertolizumab pegolen_US
dc.subjectcorticosteroiden_US
dc.subjectetanercepten_US
dc.subjectgolimumaben_US
dc.subjectinfliximaben_US
dc.subjectmethotrexateen_US
dc.subjectnonsteroid antiinflammatory agenten_US
dc.subjectsalazosulfapyridineen_US
dc.subjecttumor necrosis factor inhibitoren_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectankylosing spondylitisen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectbreast canceren_US
dc.subjectcohort analysisen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdisease activityen_US
dc.subjectdisease registryen_US
dc.subjectdrug databaseen_US
dc.subjectdrug efficacyen_US
dc.subjectdrug hypersensitivityen_US
dc.subjectdrug retentionen_US
dc.subjectdrug safetyen_US
dc.subjectdrug substitutionen_US
dc.subjectdrug withdrawalen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfirst-line treatmenten_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectlupus like syndromeen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmedication complianceen_US
dc.subjectobservational studyen_US
dc.subjectosteomyelitisen_US
dc.subjectpatient complianceen_US
dc.subjectprospective studyen_US
dc.subjectsecond-line treatmenten_US
dc.subjecttreatment durationen_US
dc.subjecttreatment responseen_US
dc.subjectuterine cervix canceren_US
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of CT-P13 as First- and Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue23en_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempUslu S., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, 45140, Turkey; Gülle S., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, 35220, Turkey; Sen G., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, 35220, Turkey; Capar S., Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, 35390, Turkey; Senel S., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, 38030, Turkey; Dalkılıc E., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, 16285, Turkey; Akar S., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Kâtip Celebi University, Izmir, 35620, Turkey; Koca S.S., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey; Tufan A., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, 06570, Turkey; Yazici A., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, 41001, Turkey; Yilmaz S., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, 42250, Turkey; Inanc N., Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34854, Turkey; Birlik M., Division of Rheumatology, School of Men_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211811886en_US
dc.authorscopusid57210139343
dc.authorscopusid56597947000
dc.authorscopusid24538140900
dc.authorscopusid7003675524
dc.authorscopusid12544841200
dc.authorscopusid6506739457
dc.authorscopusid7004438602


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record