dc.contributor.author | Linde, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Georgiadis, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ørnbjerg, L.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rasmussen, S.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Michelsen, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Askling, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Di, Giuseppe, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-12T18:55:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-12T18:55:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2151-464X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25396 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11446/5070 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Because 66/68 joint counts are not always performed in routine care, we aimed to determine which of the modified 28-joint disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA28) or 28-joint disease activity score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) should be preferred for monitoring disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) when the original DAPSA (66/68 joints) is not available. Methods: Prospectively collected real-world data of European bionaive patients with PsA initiating a first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor were pooled. Remission and response status were evaluated at 6 months by remission (DAPSA ? 4, DAPSA28 ? 4, and DAS28-CRP < 2.6), response (75% improvement for DAPSA and DAPSA28), and combined EULAR good/moderate responses for DAS28-CRP. Logistic regression analyses on multiple imputed data were used to identify baseline predictors. Results: Remission and response cohorts included 3,159 and 1,866 patients, respectively. The 6-month proportions achieving remission/response were DAPSA (27%/44%), DAPSA28 (28%/44%), and DAS28-CRP (59%/80%). Of 14 possible baseline predictors, 11 predicted both DAPSA and DAPSA28 remission (8 of which also predicted their response, indicated by “*”): longer disease duration*, male sex*, and higher CRP* were positive, whereas older age*, higher body mass index*, patient fatigue*, and global, physician global, health assessment questionnaire score*, and tender and swollen* joint counts were negative predictors. Eight and five of these predicted DAS28-CRP remission and response, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with PsA, DAPSA28 should be preferred over DAS28-CRP as a substitute for DAPSA when 66/68 joint counts are not available because of the large overlap in remission and response status and in predictors between DAPSA and DAPSA28. © 2024 The Author(s). Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Novartis | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Arthritis Care and Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/acr.25396 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Antirheumatic Agents | en_US |
dc.subject | Arthritis, Psoriatic | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomarkers | en_US |
dc.subject | C-Reactive Protein | en_US |
dc.subject | Europe | en_US |
dc.subject | Female | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Male | en_US |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Remission Induction | en_US |
dc.subject | Severity of Illness Index | en_US |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | en_US |
dc.subject | Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors | en_US |
dc.subject | Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha | en_US |
dc.subject | adalimumab | en_US |
dc.subject | C reactive protein | en_US |
dc.subject | certolizumab pegol | en_US |
dc.subject | conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug | en_US |
dc.subject | disease modifying antirheumatic drug | en_US |
dc.subject | etanercept | en_US |
dc.subject | golimumab | en_US |
dc.subject | infliximab | en_US |
dc.subject | tumor necrosis factor inhibitor | en_US |
dc.subject | unclassified drug | en_US |
dc.subject | antirheumatic agent | en_US |
dc.subject | biological marker | en_US |
dc.subject | C reactive protein | en_US |
dc.subject | tumor necrosis factor | en_US |
dc.subject | tumor necrosis factor inhibitor | en_US |
dc.subject | adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Article | en_US |
dc.subject | clinical outcome | en_US |
dc.subject | cohort analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | comparative effectiveness | en_US |
dc.subject | controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject | demographics | en_US |
dc.subject | diagnostic test accuracy study | en_US |
dc.subject | disease activity | en_US |
dc.subject | Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis | en_US |
dc.subject | Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis 28 | en_US |
dc.subject | Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis C reactive protein | en_US |
dc.subject | disease assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | disease duration | en_US |
dc.subject | female | en_US |
dc.subject | follow up | en_US |
dc.subject | Health Assessment Questionnaire | en_US |
dc.subject | human | en_US |
dc.subject | major clinical study | en_US |
dc.subject | male | en_US |
dc.subject | monitoring | en_US |
dc.subject | patient fatigue score | en_US |
dc.subject | patient pain score | en_US |
dc.subject | physician global score | en_US |
dc.subject | prediction | en_US |
dc.subject | prospective study | en_US |
dc.subject | psoriatic arthritis | en_US |
dc.subject | questionnaire | en_US |
dc.subject | sensitivity and specificity | en_US |
dc.subject | validation process | en_US |
dc.subject | aged | en_US |
dc.subject | blood | en_US |
dc.subject | clinical trial | en_US |
dc.subject | comparative study | en_US |
dc.subject | drug therapy | en_US |
dc.subject | Europe | en_US |
dc.subject | middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject | multicenter study | en_US |
dc.subject | psoriatic arthritis | en_US |
dc.subject | remission | en_US |
dc.subject | severity of illness index | en_US |
dc.subject | treatment outcome | en_US |
dc.title | Comparing DAPSA, DAPSA28, and DAS28-CRP in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Initiating a First Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Across Nine European Countries | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.department | DBÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 76 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1558 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1565 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.department-temp | Linde L., Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Georgiadis S., Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Ørnbjerg L.M., Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Rasmussen S.H., Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Michelsen B., Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and Sørlandet Sykehus HF, Kristiansand, Norway; Askling J., Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Di Giuseppe D., Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wallman J.K., Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Závada J., Institute of Rheumatology and Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; Pavelka K., Institute of Rheumatology and Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; Bernardes M., University of Porto and Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal; Matos C.O., Hospital de Santa Maria and Centro Academico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Glintborg B., The DANBIO Registry, Glostrup, Denmark, and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Loft A.G., Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark; Nordström D., Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Kuusalo L., University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finlan | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38926900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85201548710 | en_US |
dc.authorscopusid | 23986929400 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 55453151500 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 24069275900 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57844942500 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 56647884200 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 6701439674 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 56150724200 | |