Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCabioǧlu, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorKocer, Havva Belma
dc.contributor.authorKaranlik, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorGülçelik, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorIǧci, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorMüslümanoǧlu, Mahmut E.
dc.contributor.authorUras, Cihan
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-06T06:29:24Z
dc.date.available2025-10-06T06:29:24Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn2168-6262
dc.identifier.issn2168-6254
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/5421
dc.description.abstractImportance: Increasing evidence supports the oncologic safety of de-escalating axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes of de-escalating axillary surgery among patients with clinically node (cN)-positive breast cancer and patients whose disease became cN negative after NAC (ycN negative). Design, Setting, and Participants: In the NEOSENTITURK MF-1803 prospective cohort registry trial, patients from 37 centers with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD) alone or with ypN-negative or ypN-positive disease after NAC were recruited between February 15, 2019, and January 1, 2023, and evaluated. Exposure: Treatment with SLNB or TAD after NAC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary aim of the study was axillary, locoregional, or distant recurrence rates; disease-free survival; and disease-specific survival. Number of axillary lymph nodes removed was also evaluated. Results: A total of 976 patients (median age, 46 years [range, 21-80 years]) with cT1-4N1-3M0 disease underwent SLNB (n = 620) or TAD alone (n = 356). Most of the cohort had a mapping procedure with blue dye alone (645 [66.1%]) with (n = 177) or without (n = 468) TAD. Overall, no difference was found between patients treated with TAD and patients treated with SLNB in the median number of total lymph nodes removed (TAD, 4 [3-6] vs SLNB, 4 [3-6]; P =.09). Among patients with ypN-positive disease, those who underwent TAD were more likely to have a lower median lymph node ratio (TAD, 0.28 [IQR, 0.20-0.40] vs SLNB, 0.33 [IQR, 0.20-0.50]; P =.03). At a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR, 29-48 months), no significant difference was found in the rates of ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.3% [1 of 356] vs 0.3% [2 of 620]; P ≥.99) or locoregional recurrence (0.6% [2 of 356] vs 1.1% [7 of 620]; P =.50) between the TAD and SLNB groups, with an overall locoregional recurrence rate of 0.9% (9 of 976). The initial clinical tumor stage, pathologic complete response, and use of blue dye alone as a mapping procedure were not associated with the outcome. Even though patients with TAD demonstrated an increased disease-free survival rate compared with the SLNB group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (94.9% vs 92.6%; P =.07). Factors associated with decreased 5-year disease-specific survival were cN2-3 axillary stage (cN1, 98.7% vs cN2-3, 96.8%; P =.03) and nonluminal type tumor pathologic characteristics (luminal, 98.9% vs nonluminal, 96.9%; P =.007). Conclusions and Relevance: The short-term results suggest very low rates of axillary and locoregional recurrence in a select group of patients with cN-negative disease after NAC treated with TAD alone or SLNB alone followed by regional nodal irradiation regardless of the SLNB technique or nodal pathology. Whether TAD might provide a clear survival advantage compared with SLNB remains to be proven in studies with longer follow-up. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJAMA Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5913
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCarboplatinen_US
dc.subjectEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2en_US
dc.subjectCarboplatinen_US
dc.subjectEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2en_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectAxillary Lymph Nodeen_US
dc.subjectAxillary Lymph Node Dissectionen_US
dc.subjectBreast Canceren_US
dc.subjectCancer Stagingen_US
dc.subjectCancer Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectCancer Survivalen_US
dc.subjectCohort Analysisen_US
dc.subjectControlled Studyen_US
dc.subjectDisease Free Survivalen_US
dc.subjectDisease Specific Survivalen_US
dc.subjectEchographyen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFollow Upen_US
dc.subjectHumanen_US
dc.subjectImmunohistochemistryen_US
dc.subjectLymph Node Ratioen_US
dc.subjectMajor Clinical Studyen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMastectomyen_US
dc.subjectPathological Complete Responseen_US
dc.subjectRecurrence Risken_US
dc.subjectSentinel Lymph Nodeen_US
dc.subjectSentinel Lymph Node Biopsyen_US
dc.subjectStatistical Analysisen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAxillaen_US
dc.subjectBreast Tumoren_US
dc.subjectClinical Trialen_US
dc.subjectLymph Nodeen_US
dc.subjectLymph Node Dissectionen_US
dc.subjectLymph Node Metastasisen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectMulticenter Studyen_US
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant Therapyen_US
dc.subjectPathologyen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studyen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectTumor Recurrenceen_US
dc.subjectVery Elderlyen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 And Overen_US
dc.subjectAxillaen_US
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLymph Node Excisionen_US
dc.subjectLymph Nodesen_US
dc.subjectLymphatic Metastasisen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant Therapyen_US
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Localen_US
dc.subjectNeoplasm Stagingen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectSentinel Lymph Node Biopsyen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleDe-Escalation of Nodal Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Canceren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.volume160en_US
dc.identifier.startpage257en_US
dc.identifier.endpage266en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempCabioǧlu, Neslihan, Department of General Surgery, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Kocer, Havva Belma, Department of General Surgery, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Serdivan, Turkey; Karanlik, Hasan, Division of Surgical Oncology, Istanbul Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Gülçelik, Mehmet Ali, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; Iǧci, Abdullah, Department of General Surgery, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of General Surgery, VKV Amerikan Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Müslümanoǧlu, Mahmut E., Department of General Surgery, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Uras, Cihan, Department of General Surgery, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Mantoǧlu, Barış, Department of General Surgery, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Serdivan, Turkey; Trabulus, Didem Can, Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey, Now with Department of General Surgery, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Akgül, Gökhan Giray, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.pmid39745737en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85217626847en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20251006
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster