Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorIlgaz Aydınlar, Elif
dc.contributor.authorSari, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorYalınay-Dikmen, Pinar
dc.contributor.authorElmaci, Ilhan Ilhan
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-06T06:29:26Z
dc.date.available2025-10-06T06:29:26Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn1537-1603
dc.identifier.issn0736-0258
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001127
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/5428
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aims to show the impact of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) in glioma surgery in preventing severe neurologic injury and increasing tumor removal by comparing the historical cases where IOM was not used. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with glial tumors located nearby the eloquent area, operated by the same surgeon, were included in the study. Between 2008 and 2012, 21 patients were operated on without IOM (non-IOM); between 2018 and 2021, 38 patients were operated on with IOM. Results: The preoperative Karnofsky performance status scale (KPSS) scores were not statistically significant between non-IOM and IOM groups (P ¼ 0.351). Postoperative KPSS (mean 97.9) scores were 15.7% higher than preoperative KPSS (mean 84.6) in the IOM group (P, 0.001). Conversely, there was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative KPSS scores (mean 78.5 and 81.5, respectively) in the non-IOM group (P = 0.472). Moreover, postoperative KPSS scores were 20% higher in the IOM group than in the non-IOM group (P, 0.001). Preoperative tumor sizes were double the size in the non-IOM group compared with those in the IOM group (P = 0.007). Nevertheless, the postsurgery tumor residue volume was almost four times higher in the non-IOM group than that in the IOM group (P = 0.035). A median of 93.35% of the tumor volume was resected in the IOM group, but only 77.26% of the tumor was removed in the non-IOM group (P, 0.001). Conclusions: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring helps in a more radical tumor resection in glial tumors located close to the eloquent area, improves postoperative neurologic outcomes, and maintains the patient’s quality of life. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Neurophysiologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/WNP.0000000000001127
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEloquenten_US
dc.subjectGliomaen_US
dc.subjectHistorical Controlen_US
dc.subjectIntraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectOutcomeen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectCancer Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectControlled Studyen_US
dc.subjectElectroneurologyen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGlioblastomaen_US
dc.subjectGliomaen_US
dc.subjectHumanen_US
dc.subjectKarnofsky Performance Statusen_US
dc.subjectMajor Clinical Studyen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMotor Evoked Potentialen_US
dc.subjectNeuromonitoringen_US
dc.subjectNeurophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectNeurosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectQuality Of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studyen_US
dc.subjectStatistical Analysisen_US
dc.subjectSurgeonen_US
dc.subjectTumor Volumeen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectBrain Tumoren_US
dc.subjectIntraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPathologyen_US
dc.subjectPathophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectProceduresen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectBrain Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGliomaen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectIntraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectNeurosurgical Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleIntraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Improves Neurologic Outcomes in Eloquent Brain Areas and Aids in Increasing the Volume of Resected Glioma: Current Results Compared With Historical Controlsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.startpage343en_US
dc.identifier.endpage349en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempIlgaz Aydınlar, Elif, Department of Neurology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Sari, Ramazan, Department of Neurological Surgery, Demiroglu Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey; Yalınay-Dikmen, Pinar, Department of Neurology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey; Elmaci, Ilhan Ilhan, Department of Neurological Surgery, Demiroglu Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.pmid39787472en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105004777633en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20251006
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster