Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCabioglu, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Damla Okan
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, Irem
dc.contributor.authorEroz, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorToprak, Safa
dc.contributor.authorEmiroglu, Selman
dc.contributor.authorHuseynov, Elnur
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-06T06:30:18Z
dc.date.available2025-10-06T06:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn1435-2443
dc.identifier.issn1435-2451
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03767-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/5491
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThis study aimed to determine the knowledge of major benchmark trials among Turkish general surgeons to investigate if they have adopted the results in their practice.MethodsA total of 101 general surgeons from the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Society (TFBDS) were asked to complete a survey that included 24 multiple-choice questions regarding the surgical practice in axillary surgery for early and locally advanced breast cancer.ResultsMost surgeons were familiar with prospective axillary surgery studies including ACOSOG Z0011 (n = 77, 76.2%), AMAROS (n = 76, 75.2%), IBCSG 23 - 01 (n = 58, 57.4%), ACOSOG Z1071 (n = 63, 62.4%), and SENTINA (n = 67, 66.3%). Among the surgeons participating in the present survey, breast surgeons (38.6%) were less likely to perform axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early stage patients with a 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with micro- or macrometastases, as opposed to those who defined themselves as general surgeons (ALND; 36.8% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.015). Almost all surgeons suggested neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients presenting with T4 (94.8%) or N2-3 disease (92.0%), whereas almost half of the surgeons (40.5%) always proceeded with NAC in patients with clinically node-positive cN1 breast cancer. Overall, 86.1% of surgeons performed SLNB in patients whose axilla became clinically negative after NAC. More than half of the surgeons (55.2%) preferred blue dye as the SLNB technique and 37 (42.5%) used the combined method. Among 87 surgeons, 24.1% (n = 21) always, 39.1% (n = 34) sometimes, and 36.8% (n = 32) never preferred clip marking of axillary metastatic lymph nodes before NAC, whereas 56.4% performed targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after NAC. In cN+ patients before NAC, the majority of surgeons (74.3%) did not perform ALND in patients with at least three lymph nodes removed and SLNB negative. Of note, more than half of the surgeons (51.5%) did not perform ALND in the presence of isolated tumor cells or micrometastases among the three SLNs as long as regional nodal irradiation was received. However, 54.5% of the patients routinely underwent ALND in the presence of macrometastatic residual nodal disease after NAC.ConclusionDeescalating strategies in axillary surgery have been increasing in both initially clinically node-negative and-positive breast cancers as long as nodal radiation is provided.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK). None.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofLangenbecks Archives of Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00423-025-03767-9
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSentinel lymph node biopsyen_US
dc.subjectAxillary dissectionen_US
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant chemotherapyen_US
dc.subjectAxillary recurrenceen_US
dc.subjectLocoregional recurrenceen_US
dc.subjectRegional nodal irradiationen_US
dc.subjectBreast cancer recurrenceen_US
dc.subjectSurvivalen_US
dc.subjectYoung ageen_US
dc.subjectNon-luminal pathologyen_US
dc.titleChanging practice patterns in axillary management for patients with node-positive breast cancer towards increased use of sentinel lymph node biopsy-alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a survey (MF17-01) among Turkish surgeonsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.volume410en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Cabioglu, Neslihan; Ercan, Damla Okan; Karatas, Irem; Eroz, Erhan; Toprak, Safa; Emiroglu, Selman; Huseynov, Elnur; Ozkurt, Enver; Mollavelioglu, Baran; Tukenmez, Mustafa; Muslumanoglu, Mahmut; Igci, Abdullah; Ozmen, Vahit] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Karatas, Irem] Mardin Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Mardin, Turkiye; [Eroz, Erhan] Sakarya Univ Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sakarya, Turkiye; [Toprak, Safa] Koc Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Huseynov, Elnur] Avrupa Safak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ozkurt, Enver] Demiroglu Bilim Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Igci, Abdullah] Amer Hosp, Breast Ctr, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Ozmen, Vahit] Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hosp, Breast Ctr, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Cabioglu, Neslihan] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Capa Millet cad, TR-34093 Istanbul, Turkiyeen_US
dc.identifier.pmid40522373en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105008140909en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001509927000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20251006
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster