Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Sezer
dc.contributor.authorBuğra, Dursun
dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Esra K.
dc.contributor.authorAsoğlu, Oktar
dc.contributor.authorBalık, Emre
dc.contributor.authorYamaner, Sümer
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Türker
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-12T11:03:38Z
dc.date.available2015-01-12T11:03:38Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationSaglam S, Bugra D, Saglam EK, Asoglu O, Balik E, Yamaner S, Basaran M, Oral EN, Kizir A, Kapran Y, Gulluoglu M, Sakar B, Bulut T. Fourth versus eighth week surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-01 study. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 2014; 5(1): 9-17. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.025.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2078-6891
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.thejgo.org/article/view/1100en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11446/654en_US
dc.descriptionİstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi.en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimum duration between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and transmesorectal excision in locally advancedrectal cancer has not been defined yet. This randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy of four-week versus eight-week delay beforesurgery. METHODS: One-hundred and fifty-three patients with locally advanced low- or mid-rectum rectal adenocarcinoma were included in this single center prospective randomized trial. Patients were assigned to receive surgical treatment after either four weeks or eight weeks of delay afterchemoradiotherapy. Patients were followed for local recurrence and survival, and surgical specimens were examined for pathological staging and circumferential margin positivity. RESULTS: 4-week and 8-week groups did not differ with regard to lateral surgical margin positivity (9.2% vs. 5.1%, P=0.33, respectively), pathological tumor regression rate (P=0.90), overall survival (5-year, 76.5% vs. 74.2%, P=0.60) and local recurrence rate (11.8% vs. 10.3%, 0.77). Overall survival was better in patients with negative surgical margins (78.8% vs. 53.0%, P=0.04). Local recurrence rate was significantly higher among patients with positive surgical margin (28.5% vs. 9.3%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Intentional prolongation of the chemoradiotherapy-surgery interval does not seem to improve clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Surgical margin positivity seems to be more important with this regard.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPioneer Bioscience Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectrectal carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectlocal controlen_US
dc.subjectneoadjuvant radiochemotherapyen_US
dc.subjectneoadjuvant-surgery intervalen_US
dc.subjectsurgical margin positivityen_US
dc.subjectsurvivalen_US
dc.titleFourth versus eighth week surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-01 study.en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Gastrointestinal Oncologyen_US
dc.departmentDBÜ, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.startpage9
dc.identifier.endpage17
dc.contributor.authorIDTR35843en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR1758en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR107256en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR175466en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR18758en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR176728en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR10838en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR8507en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR23124en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR168101en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR168102en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR168102en_US
dc.contributor.authorIDTR4335en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryBelirsizen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster