Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDalar, Levent
dc.contributor.authorTural Önür, Seda
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorSökücü, Sinem Nedime
dc.contributor.authorKarasulu, Ahmet Levent
dc.contributor.authorAltın, Sedat
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-11T09:06:35Z
dc.date.available2016-05-11T09:06:35Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationDalar L, Tural Onur S, Ozdemir C, Sokucu SN, Karasulu AL, Altın S. Is silicone stent insertion a clinically useful option for tracheobronchomalacia? Turk J Med Sci. 2016. 46(2): 437-442. doi:10.3906/sag-1412-104en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11446/955en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medicalen_US
dc.descriptionİstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: Tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) leads to the obstruction of expiratory airflow and interference with secretion clearance. Stabilization of the airway wall using a silicon stent or laser coagulation of the posterior wall may be treatment options.1397645907This study aimed to retrospectively analyze which interventional bronchoscopic method could be used to provide airway stabilization and gain control of symptoms and for whom this method could be used. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients who had received treatment in our interventional pulmonology unit were analyzed. We analyzed the techniques used, stent duration, complications, and long-term treatment success retrospectively. Results: Stents were used in 10 patients: 4 patients had silicon Y-stents and 4 patients had silicon tracheal stents. Stents were removed due to early migration in 3 patients. In 5 of the 71397645907cases, the stent was removed due to frequent obstructions of the stent due to recurrent severe mucostasis. A suitable stent was not found for one patient who had an extremely enlarged trachea. Good clinical results were achieved in just two cases. The frequency of admissions to the emergency room and hospitalizations were diminished during the follow-up time in these two patients. Conclusion: Silicon stents may be a good treatment option in selected patients with TBM and dynamic collapse. However, our patients were high-risk; thus, the criteria for candidates for bronchoscopic treatment should be carefully defined.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTUBİTAKen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/sag-1412-104en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjecttracheobronchomalaciaen_US
dc.subjectinterventional bronchoscopyen_US
dc.subjectsilicon stentsen_US
dc.subjectAPC coagulationen_US
dc.titleIs silicone stent insertion a clinically useful option for tracheobronchomalacia?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentDBÜ, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.startpage437
dc.identifier.endpage442
dc.contributor.authorIDTR32738en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryBelirsizen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster