Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDayangaç, Murat
dc.contributor.authorTokat, Yaman
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-16T12:16:19Z
dc.date.available2016-05-16T12:16:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationDayangac M, Tokat Y. The evolution of anterior sector venous drainage in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: does one technique fit all? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5(2):151-158. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.08.01.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2304-389X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hbsn.amegroups.com/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11446/962en_US
dc.descriptionİstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), an adequate hepatic venous outflow constitutes one of the basic principles of a technically successful procedure. The issue of whether the anterior sector (AS) of the right lobe (RL) graft should or should not be routinely drained has been controversial. The aim of this 10-year, single-center, retrospective cohort study was to review the evolution of our hepatic venous outflow reconstruction technique in RL grafts and evaluate the impact of routine AS drainage strategy on the outcome. The study group consisted of 582 primary RL LDLT performed between July 2004 and December 2014. The cases were divided into 3 consecutive periods with different AS venous outflow reconstruction techniques, which included middle hepatic vein (MHV) drainage in Era 1 (n=119), a more selective AS drainage with cryopreserved homologous grafts in Era 2 (n=391), and routine segment 5 and/or 8 oriented AS drainage with synthetic grafts in Era 3 (n=72). Intraoperative portal flow measurement with routine splenic artery ligation (SAL) technique (in RL grafts with a portal flow of ≥ 250 mL/min/100 g liver tissue) was added later in Era 3. These 3 groups were compared in terms of recipient and donor demographics, surgical characteristics and short-term outcome. The rate of AS venous drainage varied from 58.8% in Era 1 and 35.0% in Era 2 to 73.6% in Era 3 (P<0.001). Perioperative mortality rate of recipients significantly decreased over the years (15.1% in Era 1 and 8.7% in Era 2 vs. 2.8% in Era 3, P=0.01). After the addition of SAL technique in the 45 cases, there was only 1 graft loss and no perioperative mortality. One-year recipient survival rate was also significantly higher in Era 3 (79.6% in Era 1 and 86.1% in Era 2 vs. 92.1% in Era 3, P=0.002). Routine AS drainage via segment 5 and/or 8 veins using synthetic grafts is a technique to fit all RL grafts in LDLT. Addition of SAL effectively prevents early graft dysfunction and significantly improves the outcome.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAME Publishing Companyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.08.01en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectliving donor liver transplantation (LDLT)en_US
dc.subjecthepatic venous outflowen_US
dc.subjectmiddle hepatic vein (MHV)en_US
dc.titleThe evalution of anterior sector venous drainage in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: does one technique fit all?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalHepatobiliary surgery and nutritionen_US
dc.departmentDBÜ, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.startpage151
dc.identifier.endpage158
dc.contributor.authorIDTR216963en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryBelirsizen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster